Anthony Reed v. W. Straughn, Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction
This text of 2020 Ark. 52 (Anthony Reed v. W. Straughn, Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Digitally signed by Susan P. Williams Reason: I attest to the accuracy and Cite as 2020 Ark. 52 integrity of this document SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS Date: No. CV-19-639 2020-12-14 15:46:50
Opinion Delivered February 6, 2020 ANTHONY REED APPELLANT PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE V. JEFFERSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 35CV-19-37] W. STRAUGHN, WARDEN, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HONORABLE JODI RAINES DENNIS, CORRECTION JUDGE APPELLEE APPEAL DISMISSED.
JOHN DAN KEMP, Chief Justice
Appellant Anthony Reed appeals the circuit court’s denial of his pro se petition for
writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated sections 16-112-101 to -
123 (Repl. 2016). Reed, who was incarcerated in Jefferson County when he filed his
petition, lodged an appeal from its denial, and submitted his brief-in-chief, was later
transferred to another prison facility and is currently incarcerated in Lincoln County.
Reed was found guilty in a jury trial of aggravated robbery, theft of property, felon
in possession of a firearm, and two counts of second-degree battery. As a habitual offender,
he was sentenced to an aggregate term of 900 months’ imprisonment. The Arkansas Court
of Appeals affirmed the convictions and sentences. Reed v. State, CACR 01-707 (Ark. App.
Feb. 27, 2002) (unpublished).
Any petition for writ of habeas corpus to effect the release of a prisoner is properly
addressed to the circuit court in which the prisoner is held in custody, unless the petition is
filed pursuant to Act 1780. See Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-112-201 to -208 (Repl. 2016). Although a circuit court may have subject-matter jurisdiction to issue the writ, a court does
not have personal jurisdiction to issue and make returnable before itself a writ of habeas
corpus to release a petitioner held in another county. Perry v. State, 2018 Ark. 14, 535
S.W.3d 264; see Mackey v. Lockhart, 307 Ark. 321, 819 S.W.2d 702 (1991). Arkansas Code
Annotated section 16-112-105 (Repl. 2016) requires that the writ be directed to the person
in whose custody the petitioner is detained. Id. Accordingly, although Reed was
incarcerated in Jefferson County when he filed the habeas petition and proceeded with this
pending appeal, a writ of habeas corpus issued by the Jefferson County Circuit Court could
not be returned because he is no longer within its jurisdiction.
Appeal dismissed.
HART, J., dissents.
JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Justice, dissenting. I dissent for the reasons stated in
Ramirez v. Kelley, 2019 Ark. 406, 591 S.W.3d 314 (Hart, J., dissenting). If habeas corpus
proceedings can be disposed of so easily as moving the prisoner to a facility in another
county, then the “great writ” has no teeth. “This court should not condone, much less
become an active participant in, such a shell game.” Id. at 3 (citing Noble v. State, 2018 Ark.
2, at 3, 534 S.W.3d 717, 718 (Hart, J., dissenting)).
Anthony L. Reed, pro se appellant.
Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Adam Jackson, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 Ark. 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-reed-v-w-straughn-warden-arkansas-department-of-correction-ark-2020.