Anthony Moore v. Timothy Schuetzle

289 F. App'x 962
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2008·No. 07-2336·Unpublished·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

North Dakota inmate Anthony James Moore appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having conducted de novo review of the record, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir.2006), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. However, as to Moore’s claim alleging a lack of exercise in administrative segregation, we amend the dismissal to be without prejudice, as the record shows he did not administratively exhaust this claim before filing the instant lawsuit. See Johnson v. Jones, 340 F.3d 624, 627 (8th Cir.2003) (inmate must exhaust before filing suit, or dismissal is mandatory).

1

. The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony Moore v. Timothy Schuetzle, 289 F. App'x 962 (8th Cir. 2008).

289 F. App'x 962 (Anthony Moore v. Timothy Schuetzle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carroll v. Auman
D. Nebraska, 2022
Silva v. State of Rhode Island
D. Rhode Island, 2021
Kealoha v. Espinda
D. Hawaii, 2020
Bacon v. Phelps
961 F.3d 533 (Second Circuit, 2020)