Anthony McGill and AP McGill Enterprise, LLC v. GJG Productions, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion issued January 15, 2019
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
of appeal on December 8, 2017, three days after it was due. Appellants did not file a motion for an extension of time.
Although this court construes notices of appeal filed within the fifteen days following the deadline imposed by Rule 26.1(a)(1) as implied motions for an extension of time, appealing parties are still required to provide a “reasonable explanation” for their failure to timely file their notices of appeal. See Brown Mech. Servs., Inc. v. Mountbatten Sur. Co., 377 S.W.3d 40, 42 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 2012, no pet.). Appellants did not include a “reasonable explanation” in their notice of appeal. Accordingly, on November 1, 2018, this court sent appellants a notice informing them that their appeal may be dismissed unless they filed within ten days a “reasonable explanation” for their untimely notice of appeal. Appellants have not responded.
Conclusion
Because appellants have failed to file a reasonable explanation for their untimely notice of appeal, despite being directed to do so, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b), 42.3(a), (c).
Richard Hightower
Justice
Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Kelly, and Hightower.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anthony McGill and AP McGill Enterprise, LLC v. GJG Productions, Inc. (Anthony McGill and AP McGill Enterprise, LLC v. GJG Productions, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.