Anthony McGill and AP McGill Enterprise, LLC v. GJG Productions, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 15, 2019
Docket01-17-00937-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Anthony McGill and AP McGill Enterprise, LLC v. GJG Productions, Inc. (Anthony McGill and AP McGill Enterprise, LLC v. GJG Productions, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony McGill and AP McGill Enterprise, LLC v. GJG Productions, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Opinion issued January 15, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00937-CV ——————————— ANTHONY MCGILL AND AP MCGILL ENTERPRISE, LLC, Appellant V. GJG PRODUCTIONS, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2015-38653

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed September 6, 2017. Appellants,

Anthony McGill and AP McGill Enterprise, LLC, filed a motion for new trial;

therefore, appellants had 90 days from the date the judgment was signed to file

their notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). Appellants filed their notice of appeal on December 8, 2017, three days after it was due. Appellants did not file

a motion for an extension of time.

Although this court construes notices of appeal filed within the fifteen days

following the deadline imposed by Rule 26.1(a)(1) as implied motions for an

extension of time, appealing parties are still required to provide a “reasonable

explanation” for their failure to timely file their notices of appeal. See Brown

Mech. Servs., Inc. v. Mountbatten Sur. Co., 377 S.W.3d 40, 42 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] 2012, no pet.). Appellants did not include a “reasonable

explanation” in their notice of appeal. Accordingly, on November 1, 2018, this

court sent appellants a notice informing them that their appeal may be dismissed

unless they filed within ten days a “reasonable explanation” for their untimely

notice of appeal. Appellants have not responded.

Conclusion

Because appellants have failed to file a reasonable explanation for their

untimely notice of appeal, despite being directed to do so, we dismiss this appeal

for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b), 42.3(a), (c).

Richard Hightower Justice

Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Kelly, and Hightower.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Mountbatten Surety Co.
377 S.W.3d 40 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Anthony McGill and AP McGill Enterprise, LLC v. GJG Productions, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-mcgill-and-ap-mcgill-enterprise-llc-v-gjg-productions-inc-texapp-2019.