Anthony McGill and AP McGill Enterprise, LLC v. GJG Productions, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 15, 2019·No. 01-17-00937-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued January 15, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

of appeal on December 8, 2017, three days after it was due. Appellants did not file a motion for an extension of time.

Although this court construes notices of appeal filed within the fifteen days following the deadline imposed by Rule 26.1(a)(1) as implied motions for an extension of time, appealing parties are still required to provide a “reasonable explanation” for their failure to timely file their notices of appeal. See Brown Mech. Servs., Inc. v. Mountbatten Sur. Co., 377 S.W.3d 40, 42 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 2012, no pet.). Appellants did not include a “reasonable explanation” in their notice of appeal. Accordingly, on November 1, 2018, this court sent appellants a notice informing them that their appeal may be dismissed unless they filed within ten days a “reasonable explanation” for their untimely notice of appeal. Appellants have not responded.

Conclusion

Because appellants have failed to file a reasonable explanation for their untimely notice of appeal, despite being directed to do so, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b), 42.3(a), (c).

Richard Hightower

Justice

Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Kelly, and Hightower.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony McGill and AP McGill Enterprise, LLC v. GJG Productions, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Anthony McGill and AP McGill Enterprise, LLC v. GJG Productions, Inc. (Anthony McGill and AP McGill Enterprise, LLC v. GJG Productions, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Mountbatten Surety Co.
377 S.W.3d 40 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012)