Anthony J. Pellicano v. United States

726 F.2d 459, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25209
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anthony J. Pellicano v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 692 F.2d 75
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 4, 1983·No. 82-4173·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We granted a rehearing, 692 F.2d 75, on the question of whether an award to Pellicano of attorneys’ fees can be made. We adopt the reasoning of Nibali v. United States, 634 F.2d 494 (Ct.C1.1980), in which the Court of Claims held that attorney fees may not be awarded in a civilian pay case that was pending in a court when the Civil Service Reform Act became effective. On that basis, the request for attorney fees pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 5596(b)(1)(A)(ii) cannot be granted.

The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with our opinion filed on November 8, 1982, and with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony J. Pellicano v. United States, 726 F.2d 459, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25209 (9th Cir. 1983).

726 F.2d 459 (Anthony J. Pellicano v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anthony J. Pellicano v. United States
692 F.2d 75 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Nibali v. United States
634 F.2d 494 (Court of Claims, 1980)