Anthony J. Cann v. Hometown Bank, N.A.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-15-00162-CV Style: Anthony J. Cann v. Hometown Bank, N.A. Date motion filed*: April 1, 2015 Type of motions: Appellant’s First Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief Parties filing motions: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time:
Original due date: N/A Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: N/A Date Requested: N/A (90 days from deadline)
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due:
Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ The motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief is denied as premature without prejudice to refiling because although the clerk’s record was filed on March 16, 2015, the briefing deadlines do not begin until after the reporter’s record has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(2).
Judge’s signature: _/s/ Laura Carter Higley
Date: April 7, 2015
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anthony J. Cann v. Hometown Bank, N.A. (Anthony J. Cann v. Hometown Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.