Anthony J. Cann v. Hometown Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 7, 2015·No. 01-15-00162-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-15-00162-CV Style: Anthony J. Cann v. Hometown Bank, N.A. Date motion filed*: April 1, 2015 Type of motions: Appellant’s First Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief Parties filing motions: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: N/A Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: N/A Date Requested: N/A (90 days from deadline)

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:

 Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ The motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief is denied as premature without prejudice to refiling because although the clerk’s record was filed on March 16, 2015, the briefing deadlines do not begin until after the reporter’s record has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(2).

Judge’s signature: _/s/ Laura Carter Higley 

Date: April 7, 2015

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony J. Cann v. Hometown Bank, N.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Anthony J. Cann v. Hometown Bank, N.A. (Anthony J. Cann v. Hometown Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.