Anthony J. Cann v. Hometown Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Opinion issued September 29, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
42.3(c). On September 3, 2015, appellant’s counsel timely responded to the notice
by filing a “Notice of Nonsuit Without Prejudice,” which we construe as a motion
to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Although the motion does
not contain a certificate of conference, it has a certificate of service on the
appellee’s counsel and more than ten days have passed with no response filed. See
id. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2). No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no
opinion has issued. See id. 42.1(a)(1), (c).
Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anthony J. Cann v. Hometown Bank, N.A. (Anthony J. Cann v. Hometown Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.