Anthony J. Cann v. Hometown Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 29, 2015·No. 01-15-00162-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued September 29, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

42.3(c). On September 3, 2015, appellant’s counsel timely responded to the notice

by filing a “Notice of Nonsuit Without Prejudice,” which we construe as a motion

to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Although the motion does

not contain a certificate of conference, it has a certificate of service on the

appellee’s counsel and more than ten days have passed with no response filed. See

id. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2). No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no

opinion has issued. See id. 42.1(a)(1), (c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony J. Cann v. Hometown Bank, N.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Anthony J. Cann v. Hometown Bank, N.A. (Anthony J. Cann v. Hometown Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.