Anthony G. Scariano v. Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana and Members of the State Board of Law Examiners of the State of Indiana
This text of 47 F.3d 173 (Anthony G. Scariano v. Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana and Members of the State Board of Law Examiners of the State of Indiana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
On November 9,1994, the petitioner filed a petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc. An answer to the petition was requested and filed. All of the judges on the original panel, CUMMINGS, BAUER, and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges, voted to deny a rehearing. A judge in regular active service requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and the majority of the judges voted to deny an en banc rehearing. POSNER, Chief Judge, FLAUM and ROVNER, Circuit Judges, voted to grant rehearing. Accordingly, the petition for rehearing is, hereby Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 F.3d 173, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2149, 1995 WL 42703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-g-scariano-v-justices-of-the-supreme-court-of-the-state-of-ca7-1995.