Anthony G. Buzbee, and the Buzbee Law Firm v. Roberto Canales, M.D. and Roberto Canales, M.D. P.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Anthony G. Buzbee, and the Buzbee Law Firm v. Roberto Canales, M.D. and Roberto Canales, M.D. P.A.

DecidedAugust 12, 2020

Docket08-20-00138-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Anthony G. Buzbee, and the Buzbee Law Firm v. Roberto Canales, M.D. and Roberto Canales, M.D. P.A. (Anthony G. Buzbee, and the Buzbee Law Firm v. Roberto Canales, M.D. and Roberto Canales, M.D. P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anthony G. Buzbee, and the Buzbee Law Firm v. Roberto Canales, M.D. and Roberto Canales, M.D. P.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§ ANTHONY G. BUZBEE, AND THE No. 08-20-00138-CV BUZBEE LAW FIRM, § Appeal from the Appellants, § 41st District Court v. § of El Paso County, Texas ROBERTO CANALES, M.D. AND § ROBERTO CANALES, M.D. P.A., (TC# 2020DCV0691) § Appellees. §

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellants' Unopposed Motion to Correct the Clerk's Record. Appellants ask this Court to order that (1) a pagination error be corrected and (2) the Plaintiffs’ Amended Petition be excluded from the Clerk’s Record, or, alternatively, that a Supplemental Clerk’s Record be filed which contains the Appellants’ Supplement to Request for Clerk’s Record (a document filed with the trial court that appears to object to the filing of the amended petition and asserts that an automatic stay is in place). The Court GRANTS Appellants’ unopposed motion to supplement the Clerk’s Record, in part, as follows: • Appellants’ request for a correction of a pagination error in the Clerk’s Record is GRANTED. Pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 34.5(d), the District Clerk is ordered to submit a Corrected Clerk’s Record that contains the missing pagination (from pages 82 to 113). The Corrected Clerk’s Record is due before this Court on or before August 22, 2020.

• Appellants’ request to exclude the Plaintiffs’ Amended Petition (CR 353-365) from the Clerk’s Record/Correct Clerk’s Record is DENIED.

1 • Appellants’ request to supplement the Clerk’s Record is GRANTED. The District Clerk is ordered to file a Supplemental Clerk’s Record containing a copy of Appellants’ Supplement to Request for Clerk’s Record. The supplemental Clerk’s Record containing the copy of the Appellants’ supplementation request is due in this Court on or before August 22, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of August, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§ ANTHONY G. BUZBEE, AND THE No. 08-20-00138-CV BUZBEE LAW FIRM, § Appeal from the Appellants, § 41st District Court v. § of El Paso County, Texas ROBERTO CANALES, M.D. AND § ROBERTO CANALES, M.D. P.A., (TC# 2020DCV0691) § Appellees. §

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellants' Unopposed Motion to Correct the Clerk's Record. Appellants ask this Court to order that (1) a pagination error be corrected and (2) the Plaintiffs’ Amended Petition be excluded from the Clerk’s Record, or, alternatively, that a Supplemental Clerk’s Record be filed which contains the Appellants’ Supplement to Request for Clerk’s Record (a document filed with the trial court that appears to object to the filing of the amended petition and asserts that an automatic stay is in place). The Court GRANTS Appellants’ unopposed motion to supplement the Clerk’s Record, in part, as follows: • Appellants’ request for a correction of a pagination error in the Clerk’s Record is GRANTED. Pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 34.5(d), the District Clerk is ordered to submit a Corrected Clerk’s Record that contains the missing pagination (from pages 82 to 113). The Corrected Clerk’s Record is due before this Court on or before August 22, 2020.

• Appellants’ request to exclude the Plaintiffs’ Amended Petition (CR 353-365) from the Clerk’s Record/Correct Clerk’s Record is DENIED.

1 • Appellants’ request to supplement the Clerk’s Record is GRANTED. The District Clerk is ordered to file a Supplemental Clerk’s Record containing a copy of Appellants’ Supplement to Request for Clerk’s Record. The supplemental Clerk’s Record containing the copy of the Appellants’ supplementation request is due in this Court on or before August 22, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of August, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Anthony G. Buzbee, and the Buzbee Law Firm v. Roberto Canales, M.D. and Roberto Canales, M.D. P.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-g-buzbee-and-the-buzbee-law-firm-v-roberto-canales-md-and-texapp-2020.