Anthony Deon Bradford v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 23, 2015·No. 14-15-00202-CR·Published

Opinion

Return to: Fourteenth Court of Appeals 301 Fannin, Room 245 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS

Houston, TX 77002 HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/23/2015 11:41:23 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

NO. 14-_15_-00202-CR Clerk

Anthony Deon Bradford, Appellant § COURT OF APPEALS

§ 14TH DISTRICT

The State of Texas § HOUSTON, TEXAS

Pro se Motion for Access to Appellate Record

To the Honorable Justices of Said Court:

On July 23, 2015, appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in the above styled and numbered cause pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Anthony Deon Bradford, appellant, moves this court to provide him pro se access to a copy of the appellate record including the clerk’s record and the court reporter’s record.

Appellant requests an extension of time of 30 days from the date he receives the appellate record to file a pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief.

Respectfully submitted,

Pro se Appellant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on ___________, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document was served by mail on the Galveston County District Attorney’s Office at the following address: Jack Roady, Galveston County, Criminal District Attorney, 600 59th St # 1001, Galveston, TX 77551.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony Deon Bradford v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Anthony Deon Bradford v. State (Anthony Deon Bradford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)