Anthony Deon Bradford v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 29, 2015·No. 14-15-00202-CR·Published

Opinion

Motion Granted and Order filed July 28, 2015

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00201-CR NO. 14-15-00202-CR

ANTHONY DEON BRADFORD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 14CR0146 and 14CR0147

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Counsel has filed a motion to allow appellant an opportunity to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is granted.

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 122nd District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before August 13, 2015; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony Deon Bradford v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Anthony Deon Bradford v. State (Anthony Deon Bradford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Gainous v. State
436 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)