ANTHONY ADAMS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of ANTHONY ADAMS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (ANTHONY ADAMS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed September 6, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-382 Lower Tribunal No. F90-45200 ________________
Anthony Adams, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Shearon Cruz, Judge.
Anthony Adams, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sheron Wells, Assistant Attorney General (Tallahassee), for appellee.
Before SCALES, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Williams v. Wasi, 681 So. 2d 839, 840 (Fla. 4th DCA
1996) (“We find no merit in his distinction between basic gain-time and
incentive gain-time, holding that both may be subject to forfeiture by the DOC
pursuant to section 944.28(1), Florida Statutes (1995).”); Waldrup v. Dugger,
562 So. 2d 687, 689 (Fla. 1990) (noting a “basic gain-time award was subject
to forfeiture for unacceptable conduct”); Singletary v. Jones, 681 So. 2d 836,
837 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (“[I]nmates receive a lump sum award of all basic
gain time to which they may be entitled throughout the full term of their
sentences upon entering the prison system. This gain time is earned when
so credited, and is thereafter subject to earned gain time forfeiture.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ANTHONY ADAMS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-adams-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.