Anonymous

4 How. Pr. 112
New York Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1849·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Willard, Justice,

held that, as between the plaintiff and defendant, the judgment was regular, and there being no affidavit of merits, it could not be disturbed. The return of the sheriff to the capias was matter of record, and could not be impeached in that collateral way, especially where there was no pretence of fraud or collusion. (See Evans v. Parker, 20 Wend. 622; Baker v. McDuffie, 23 Ib. 289; Mentz v. Hanman, 5 Whart. 150.) Motion denied, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anonymous, 4 How. Pr. 112 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1849).

4 How. Pr. 112 (Anonymous) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Van Valkenburg
16 How. Pr. 144 (New York Supreme Court, 1858)