Anniston Soil Pipe Company v. Central Foundry Company, Huey White v. Central Foundry Co.

329 F.2d 313, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6050
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 13, 1964
Docket20831
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 329 F.2d 313 (Anniston Soil Pipe Company v. Central Foundry Company, Huey White v. Central Foundry Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anniston Soil Pipe Company v. Central Foundry Company, Huey White v. Central Foundry Co., 329 F.2d 313, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6050 (5th Cir. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only question on this appeal is whether the appellee corporation has its principal place of business in New York or in Alabama. If its principal place of business is in New York there is the diversity of citizenship requisite for federal jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332(c). If the principal place of business is Alabama there is no federal jurisdiction. The district court decided that the principal place of business was in Alabama and dismissed the action. Anniston Soil Pipe Co. v. Central Foundry Co., D.C., 216 F.Supp. 473. We are in agreement with the district court in its decision and the reasons set forth in its opinion. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wheelwright Trucking Co. v. Dorsey Trailers, Inc.
158 F. Supp. 2d 1298 (M.D. Alabama, 2001)
Dorsey v. J. Ray McDermott, Inc.
750 So. 2d 996 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1999)
Thibodeaux v. Samedan Oil Corp.
913 F. Supp. 488 (E.D. Texas, 1995)
MERCURY FIN. CORP. OF ALA. v. Aetna Cas. Co.
900 F. Supp. 390 (M.D. Alabama, 1995)
O'Connor v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A.
699 F. Supp. 1538 (S.D. Florida, 1988)
J.A. Olson Company v. City of Winona, Mississippi
818 F.2d 401 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)
Richmond Construction Corp. v. Hilb
482 F. Supp. 1201 (M.D. Florida, 1980)
MacDiarmid v. Lawbar Petroleum
456 F. Supp. 503 (W.D. Texas, 1978)
Deeter-Ritchey-Sippel Associates v. Westminster College
357 A.2d 608 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Mullins v. Beatrice Pocahontas Company
374 F. Supp. 282 (W.D. Virginia, 1974)
Judge M. Mullins v. Beatrice Pocahontas Company
489 F.2d 260 (Fourth Circuit, 1974)
Delome v. Union Barge Line Co.
444 F.2d 225 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
Danos v. Waterford Oil Company
351 F.2d 940 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
Danos v. Waterford Oil Co.
351 F.2d 940 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
329 F.2d 313, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anniston-soil-pipe-company-v-central-foundry-company-huey-white-v-ca5-1964.