Home/Fifth Circuit/Anniston Soil Pipe Company v. Central Foundry Company, Huey White v. Central Foundry Co.

Anniston Soil Pipe Company v. Central Foundry Company, Huey White v. Central Foundry Co.

329 F.2d 313, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6050
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 13, 1964·No. 20831·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only question on this appeal is whether the appellee corporation has its principal place of business in New York or in Alabama. If its principal place of business is in New York there is the diversity of citizenship requisite for federal jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332(c). If the principal place of business is Alabama there is no federal jurisdiction. The district court decided that the principal place of business was in Alabama and dismissed the action. Anniston Soil Pipe Co. v. Central Foundry Co., D.C., 216 F.Supp. 473. We are in agreement with the district court in its decision and the reasons set forth in its opinion. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anniston Soil Pipe Company v. Central Foundry Company, Huey White v. Central Foundry Co., 329 F.2d 313, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6050 (5th Cir. 1964).

329 F.2d 313 (Anniston Soil Pipe Company v. Central Foundry Company, Huey White v. Central Foundry Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wheelwright Trucking Co. v. Dorsey Trailers, Inc.
158 F. Supp. 2d 1298 (M.D. Alabama, 2001)
Dorsey v. J. Ray McDermott, Inc.
750 So. 2d 996 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1999)
Thibodeaux v. Samedan Oil Corp.
913 F. Supp. 488 (E.D. Texas, 1995)
Mercury Finance Corp. of Alabama v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of Illinois
900 F. Supp. 390 (M.D. Alabama, 1995)
MERCURY FIN. CORP. OF ALA. v. Aetna Cas. Co.
900 F. Supp. 390 (M.D. Alabama, 1995)
O'Connor v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A.
699 F. Supp. 1538 (S.D. Florida, 1988)
J.A. Olson Company v. City of Winona, Mississippi
818 F.2d 401 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)
Richmond Construction Corp. v. Hilb
482 F. Supp. 1201 (M.D. Florida, 1980)
Village Fair Shopping Center Co. v. Sam Broadhead Trust
588 F.2d 431 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
Village Fair Shopping Center Company, a Partnership, Cross-Appellee v. The Sam Broadhead Trust, Cross-Appellants v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company, Intervenor-Third Party Appellant-Cross-Appellee
588 F.2d 431 (Third Circuit, 1979)
MacDiarmid v. Lawbar Petroleum
456 F. Supp. 503 (W.D. Texas, 1978)
Deeter-Ritchey-Sippel Associates v. Westminster College
357 A.2d 608 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Mullins v. Beatrice Pocahontas Company
374 F. Supp. 282 (W.D. Virginia, 1974)
Judge M. Mullins v. Beatrice Pocahontas Company
489 F.2d 260 (Fourth Circuit, 1974)
The American Foundation, Inc. v. Mountain Lake Corporation
454 F.2d 200 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
C. J. Paul Delome v. Union Barge Line Company, Defendants-Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Platzer Shipyard, Inc., Third-Aprtydefendant-Appellee- Cross
444 F.2d 225 (Third Circuit, 1971)
Delome v. Union Barge Line Co.
444 F.2d 225 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
Danos v. Waterford Oil Company
351 F.2d 940 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
Danos v. Waterford Oil Co.
351 F.2d 940 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)