Anniston Soil Pipe Co. v. Central Foundry Co.

216 F. Supp. 473, 1963 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10324
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama
DecidedApril 30, 1963
DocketCiv. A. 1081
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 216 F. Supp. 473 (Anniston Soil Pipe Co. v. Central Foundry Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anniston Soil Pipe Co. v. Central Foundry Co., 216 F. Supp. 473, 1963 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10324 (N.D. Ala. 1963).

Opinion

LYNNE, Chief Judge.

By motion to dismiss, defendant, The Central Foundry Company, a corporation, advances the contention that its principal place of business, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332(c), is Holt, Alabama, and that there is therefore lacking diversity of citizenship between it and plaintiff, an Alabama corporation.

Proceeding to a determination of the threshold jurisdictional issue in limine on a special hearing, Birmingham Post Company v. Brown, 217 F.2d 127 (5th Cir.1954) the court has heard and considered all relevant evidence adduced by the parties.

The Central Foundry Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maine. It is engaged in the manufacture and sale of soil pipe and fittings, selling its product throughout the United States and abroad.

At one time, it had production facilities in New Jersey and Alabama. In recent years, all of its production facilities and plant have been located at Holt, Alabama. For several years prior to 1960 its executive offices were located in Newark, New Jersey; in 1960 they were moved to New York City. Presently such offices are located at 932 Broadway, New York City, New York. Its president and chairman of its board, Mr. Sidney Gondelman; its executive vice president, Mr. William Maidman; its secretary, Mr. H. L. Grayson; its treasurer, Mr. R. J. Hanwell; its assistant treasurer, a Mr. Kyle; and its director in charge of its operations at Holt, Alabama, Mr. R. R. Fisher, neither of whom, except for Mr. Fisher, has had any experience in foundry operations or heavy manufacturing, are all residents of New York and maintain their offices at 932 Broadway, New York City, New York.

The only officer of the company who is not resident of and whose office is not located in New York is Mr. John J. Bowers whose office is that of vice president, whose title is also plant; manager, and who manages the company’s operations at Holt, Alabama, working directly under the supervision and control of Mr. R. R. Fisher, the director of Holt operations, who spends approximately eighty-five per cent of his time in New York and fifteen per cent at Holt, Alabama.

*474 Mr. J. J. Flynn is the vice president of the company in charge of sales. His staff and office are located in New York. He makes all determinations as to whom the company shall sell, the price at which the company’s products will be sold and, in collaboration with the company’s assistant treasurer, whether or not a customer of the company will be extended credit and the terms of such credit so extended.

Sales of the company’s products are made to its patrons and customers through manufacturers’ representatives, who are residents of various states. All payments for the products of the company purchased by its patrons and customers are directed to be made and, in fact, are made at the company's offices in New York and the invoices received by customers so instruct. When funds are received in payment of accounts receivable, they are deposited in the company’s New Jersey and New York bank accounts.

The total sales of the company for the year 1962 were approximately $25,000,-000.00. The orders for eighty per cent or more of such sales were forwarded to, shipped and billed from the company’s plant at Holt, Alabama.

The company employs 55 persons in the State of New York, 22 of whom are classified as exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act, and employs 1,890 at Holt, Alabama, 49 of whom are classified as exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

In addition to its executive offices at New York and its production facilities at Holt, Alabama, the company maintains a warehouse at Forest Hills, New York, and a warehouse and depot at Newark, New Jersey, from which the company ships to its customers in those areas approximately $3,000,000.00 in annual sales of its products.

The total annual payroll of officers and employees of the company at its offices in New York is approximately $500,000.00, the average per employee being approximately $9,000.00 annually. The total annual payroll at Holt, Alabama is approximately $9,200,000.00, the average per employee being approximately $4,800.00.

The physical assets of the company in the State of New York, excluding its bank funds and receivables, have a book value of approximately $60,000.00. The company’s physical assets located at Holt, Alabama have a book value of approximately $5,695,000.00.

The production and manufacturing facilities of the company are located on a one hundred ten acre tract owned by the company at Holt, Alabama. The engineering functions of the company are located at Holt, Alabama and all production, based upon orders approved in New York, are scheduled there. The company maintains its only personnel department at Holt which is authorized to hire or fire local employees and to negotiate union contracts and adjust union grievances.

The New York office occupies approximately 10,000 square feet of floor space. The law firm of Royall, Koegel & Rogers, of New York City, is general counsel for the company and associate counsel in these actions.

Publicity and public relations of Central Foundry Company are handled by a Mr. Gallis, whose offices are in New York. All publicity releases are issued out of New York.

All customer relations respecting service and credit are handled by Mr. H. L. Grayson, a vice president of the company, whose office is in New York. Mr. Sidney Gondelman, chairman of the board and president of the Central Foundry Company, takes an active interest in the sales, activities and business of the company and attends the various conventions held by suppliers and manufacturers’ representatives for the purpose of creating good will and securing customers for the company. Mr. Gondel-man’s time is primarily devoted to the business of Central Foundry Company.

The insurance function is handled by the treasurer, Mr. Hanwell, in the New *475 York office. The company maintains a pension plan for its salaried employees. The plan is administered by a retirement group appointed by the board of ■directors in New York and the funds for the plan are invested in investment houses and banks in New York and New Jersey.

The company has borrowed substantial sums of money and all the decisions and negotiations concerning these loans were made in New York. All payments on the loans are made from the New York ■office.

The company’s books and records are kept in New York. The company’s operation at Holt, Alabama forwards copies •of all its records to New York where they are consolidated with the records from the company’s operations in Newark, New Jersey and Forest Hills, New York. The treasurer and assistant treasurer visit the plant at Holt, Alabama from time to time to check and verify the records. The treasurer spends approximately ten per cent of his time in Holt and ninety per cent in New York. The company’s Federal income tax returns are filed in New York.

The offices of the company’s auditor, Arthur Young and Company, are located in New York. The stock book of the •company is kept in the New York office. The offices of the Stock Transfer Agent are located in New York.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wheelwright Trucking Co. v. Dorsey Trailers, Inc.
158 F. Supp. 2d 1298 (M.D. Alabama, 2001)
Dorsey v. J. Ray McDermott, Inc.
750 So. 2d 996 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1999)
Thibodeaux v. Samedan Oil Corp.
913 F. Supp. 488 (E.D. Texas, 1995)
MERCURY FIN. CORP. OF ALA. v. Aetna Cas. Co.
900 F. Supp. 390 (M.D. Alabama, 1995)
O'Connor v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A.
699 F. Supp. 1538 (S.D. Florida, 1988)
J.A. Olson Company v. City of Winona, Mississippi
818 F.2d 401 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)
Richmond Construction Corp. v. Hilb
482 F. Supp. 1201 (M.D. Florida, 1980)
In The Matter Of Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., Inc.
596 F.2d 1239 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
MacDiarmid v. Lawbar Petroleum
456 F. Supp. 503 (W.D. Texas, 1978)
Deeter-Ritchey-Sippel Associates v. Westminster College
357 A.2d 608 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Mullins v. Beatrice Pocahontas Company
374 F. Supp. 282 (W.D. Virginia, 1974)
Judge M. Mullins v. Beatrice Pocahontas Company
489 F.2d 260 (Fourth Circuit, 1974)
Delome v. Union Barge Line Co.
444 F.2d 225 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
Danos v. Waterford Oil Company
351 F.2d 940 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 F. Supp. 473, 1963 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anniston-soil-pipe-co-v-central-foundry-co-alnd-1963.