Animal Leg Def Fund v. Glickman, Daniel

204 F.3d 229
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 4, 2000·No. 97-5009·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For The District of Columbia Circuit

No. 97-5009 September Term, 1999 96cv00408

Animal Legal Defense Fund, Inc., et al., Appellees

v.

National Association For Biomedical Research, Appellant

__________________________________________ Consolidated with 97-5031, 97-5074

BEFORE: Williams, Sentelle and Garland, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

It is ORDERED, on the Court's own motion, that the opinion filed herein this date is amended, as follows:

At Page One:

Delete the text beginning with "No. 97-5009" and ending with "Consolidated with Nos. 97-5031 and 97-5074".

and insert in lieu thereof: No. 97-5031

Animal Legal Defense Fund, Inc., et al., Appellees

v.

Daniel R. Glickman, In his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture, et al., Appellants

National Association For Biomedical Research, Appellee

___________

Consolidated with Nos. 97-5009 and 97-5074

At Page One, in the section setting forth the names of counsel, in paragraph one, line two:

Delete

"In Nos 97-5009 and"

And insert in lieu thereof

"Glickman, et al. in"

At Page two,

Delete the first full paragraph

And insert in lieu thereof

Harris Weinstein argued the cause for appellant National Association for Biomedical Research in No. 97-5009. Michael G. Michaelson was with him on the brief.

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

Filed on February 1, 2000

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Animal Leg Def Fund v. Glickman, Daniel, 204 F.3d 229 (D.C. Cir. 2000).

204 F.3d 229 (Animal Leg Def Fund v. Glickman, Daniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.