Anifer v. Clement Trucking LLC

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Penni Anifer, et al., No. CV-23-00518-TUC-SHR (MSA)

10 Plaintiffs, Order Accepting R&R with No Objections (Default Judgment) 11 v.

12 Clement Trucking LLC, et al.,

13 Defendants. 14 15 On August 21, 2024, Magistrate Judge Maria S. Aguilera issued a Report and 16 Recommendation (“R&R”) in which she recommended the Court grant Plaintiffs’ Motion 17 for Entry of Default Judgment. (Doc. 18 at 1, 7.) The R&R notified the parties they had 18 fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the R&R to file any objections. (Id. 19 at 7.) Plaintiff mailed a copy of the R&R via U.S. mail to Defendants. (Doc. 19.) 20 If neither party objects to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the 21 District Court is not required to review the magistrate judge’s decision under any specified 22 standard of review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); see also United States v. 23 Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (district court only needs to 24 review magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made). 25 However, the statute for review of a magistrate judge’s recommendation “does not preclude 26 further review by the district judge, sua sponte or at the request of a party, under a de novo 27 or any other standard.” Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154. 28 In this case, Defendants were served on September 4, 2024 when Plaintiffs mailed || a copy of the R&R to Defendants’ last known address. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C). || Consequently, the deadline for filing objections has passed and neither party has requested □□ additional time file an objection despite the warning from Judge Aguilera indicating 4|| “[flailure to file timely objections to any factual or legal determination of the Magistrate 5 || Judge may result in waiver of the night of review.” (Doc. 18 at 7.) Therefore, the Court || will adopt the R&R on that basis alone. See Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 7\| 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (district court declined to review the magistrate judge’s report 8 || because no objections were filed). 9 Accordingly, 10 IT IS ORDERED 11 1) Magistrate Judge Aguilera's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) is 12 ACCEPTED. 13 2) Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. 14 3) Default judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Penni Anifer in the amount of 15 $18,225. As to Plaintiff Anifer, all Defendants are jointly and severally liable 16 for $5,760, and that Defendants Clement Trucking LLC and Archie Lane LLC 17 are jointly and severally liable for $12,465. 18 4) Default judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Kevin Sisk in the amount of 19 $10,650. As to Plaintiff Sisk, all Defendants are jointly and severally liable for 20 $3,840, and that Defendants Clement Trucking LLC and Archie Lane LLC are 21 jointly and severally liable for $6,810. 22 5) Plaintiffs shall be awarded post-judgment interest at the current rate pursuant to 23 28 U.S.C. § 1961. 24 6) The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file in this 25 case. 26 Dated this 24th day of September, 2024.

Honorable Scott H, Rash _/ United States District Judge _2-