Anifer v. Clement Trucking LLC

• Court: District Court, D. Arizona
• Decided: January 24, 2024
• Docket: 4:23-cv-00518
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Penni Anifer, et al., No. CV-23-00518-TUC-SHR (MSA)

10 Plaintiffs, ORDER

11 v.

12 Clement Trucking LLC, et al.,

13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiffs Penni Anifer and Kevin Sisk filed this action on November 14, 2023, 16 alleging three wage claims against Clement Trucking LLC, Archie Lane LLC, Roberto 17 Clement, and Guadalupe Monreal. (Doc. 1.) The service deadline is February 12, 2024. See 18 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (requiring that service be made within 90 days). Plaintiffs have 19 attempted without success to complete personal service, so they now move for leave to 20 complete service by alternative means. (Doc. 10.) The motion will be granted. 21 A defendant may be served by “following state law for serving a summons in an 22 action brought in courts of general jurisdiction in the state where the district court is located 23 or where service is made.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). Under state law, service by alternative 24 means is appropriate if personal service is “impracticable.” Ariz. R. Civ. P. 4.1(k)(1). 25 “Impracticable does not mean impossible, but rather that service would be ‘extremely 26 difficult or inconvenient.’” Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Dodev, 433 P.3d 549, 558 (Ariz. Ct. 27 App. 2018) (quoting Blair v. Burgener, 245 P.3d 898, 903 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010)). 28 When service is done by alternative means, the plaintiff “must make a reasonable 1 effort to provide the person being served with actual notice of the action’s commencement” 2 and must also “mail the summons, the pleading being served, and any court order 3 authorizing an alternative means of service to the last-known business or residential 4 address of the person being served.” Ariz. R. Civ. P. 4.1(k)(2). Similarly, to satisfy due 5 process, service must be “reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise 6 interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present 7 their objections.” Rio Props., Inc. v. Rio Int’l Interlink, 284 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2002) 8 (quoting Mullane v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Tr. Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314 (1950)). 9 Plaintiffs have satisfied these requirements. They have tried, seven times, to serve 10 Defendants at Clement and Monreal’s home—a place where Defendants have been served 11 before—but have not had success. (Doc. 10-1 at 2–3.) On the first attempt, the process 12 server saw Monreal’s vehicle in the driveway and saw the window blinds move. (Id. at 3.) 13 On the third attempt, the process server saw a Dodge vehicle in the driveway. (Id.) On the 14 sixth attempt, the process server left his card in the front door but apparently never heard 15 back. (Id.) On the seventh attempt, Clement apparently saw the process server before 16 driving away in the Dodge vehicle, and the process server saw Monreal’s vehicle in the 17 driveway. (Id.) These circumstances suggest that Defendants are evading service. This 18 makes personal service impracticable. Ritchie v. Salvatore Gatto Partners, L.P., 222 P.3d 19 920, 923 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010). Furthermore, Plaintiff’s proposed means of service—by 20 regular and certified U.S. mail to Defendants’ business and home addresses, and by posting 21 the service packet on the front door of Defendants’ business and home addresses—is 22 reasonably calculated to provide Defendants with actual notice of this lawsuit, as their 23 physical presences have previously been confirmed at one of those addresses. Therefore, 24 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion for alternative service (Doc. 10) is 25 granted. 26 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs may serve Defendants with the 27 summons, complaint, and this Order by doing each of the following: 28 1. Posting a copy of the summons, complaint, and this Order to the front door 1|| of Defendants’ addresses: 7050 N. Ist Ave., Tucson, AZ 85718; 1621 N. 6th Ave., #2, 2|| Tucson, AZ 85705; and 31 N. 6th Ave., Ste. 105-129, Tucson, AZ 85701; and 3 2. Mailing a copy of said documents to the same addresses via U.S. First Class Mail and Certified Mail. 5 Dated this 24th day of January, 2024. 6 WS .

8 . 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

-3-