Anglo-American and Overseas Corporation v. United States

242 F.2d 236, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 2786
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 4, 1957·No. 155, Docket 24194·Published·Cited by 24 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anglo-American and Overseas Corp., appellant, contracted to sell tomato paste to the United States, which required as a condition precedent to its acceptance of the paste that it satisfy the standards of the Food and Drug Administration. The paste was imported; and the Food and Drug Administration, after sampling it, issued “release notices” that notified Customs officers that the tomato paste could enter the country. Anglo-American then accepted delivery. When it in turn delivered the paste to the government, federal officials once again inspected the paste, found that it did not satisfy the standards of the Food and Drug Administration, and ordered it destroyed. Anglo-American sues now on the ground that the negligence of officials of the Food and Drug Administration in sampling the tomato paste and in issuing “release notices” induced it to accept the paste and thus suffer damages.

This claim, it is clear, “arose out of” the assertedly negligent representation of the quality of the tomato paste by federal employees. Such a claim is barred by Jones v. United States, 2 Cir., 207 F.2d 563, certiorari denied 347 U.S. 921, 74 S.Ct. 518, 98 L.Ed. 1075, which held that Section 2680(h) of the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C., excepted from liability negligent as well as intentional misrepresentation.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anglo-American and Overseas Corporation v. United States, 242 F.2d 236, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 2786 (2d Cir. 1957).

242 F.2d 236 (Anglo-American and Overseas Corporation v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fina Air Inc. v. United States
555 F. Supp. 2d 321 (D. Puerto Rico, 2008)
Gildor v. United States Postal Service
179 F. App'x 756 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Dorking Genetics v. United States
76 F.3d 1261 (Second Circuit, 1996)
Reynolds v. United States
643 F.2d 707 (Tenth Circuit, 1981)
Lloyd v. Cessna Aircraft Co.
429 F. Supp. 181 (E.D. Tennessee, 1977)
Cargill, Inc. v. United States
426 F. Supp. 127 (D. Minnesota, 1976)
Clyde Fitch and Sharon Fitch v. United States
513 F.2d 1013 (Sixth Circuit, 1975)
Griffin v. United States
351 F. Supp. 10 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1972)
Marival, Inc. v. Planes, Inc.
306 F. Supp. 855 (N.D. Georgia, 1969)
United States v. Sheehan Properties, Inc.
285 F. Supp. 608 (D. Minnesota, 1968)
Coastwise Packet Co. v. United States
277 F. Supp. 920 (D. Massachusetts, 1968)
Vaughn v. United States
259 F. Supp. 286 (N.D. Mississippi, 1966)
United States v. Anasae International Corporation
197 F. Supp. 926 (S.D. New York, 1961)
United States v. Neustadt
366 U.S. 696 (Supreme Court, 1961)
Hungerford v. United States
192 F. Supp. 581 (N.D. California, 1961)
Brown v. United States
193 F. Supp. 692 (N.D. Florida, 1961)