Anglia Jacs & Co. v. Rosenberg

806 So. 2d 624, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2963, 2002 WL 181124
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 6, 2002
DocketNo. 4D01-4166
StatusPublished

This text of 806 So. 2d 624 (Anglia Jacs & Co. v. Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anglia Jacs & Co. v. Rosenberg, 806 So. 2d 624, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2963, 2002 WL 181124 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anglia Jacs & Company, Inc. petitions this court for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the circuit court appellate division which dismissed its appeal. We accept jurisdiction, and grant the petition. See Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So.2d 523, 530 (Fla.1995). The circuit court denied petitioner due process when it dismissed the appeal before affording petitioner an opportunity to file a response to the motion to dismiss as provided in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300(a). See Mirage Pools, Inc. v. Dewitt, 757 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). On [625]*625remand, the circuit ■ court shall reinstate petitioner’s appeal.

STONE, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haines City Community Dev. v. Heggs
658 So. 2d 523 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Mirage Pools, Inc. v. Dewitt
757 So. 2d 1280 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
806 So. 2d 624, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2963, 2002 WL 181124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anglia-jacs-co-v-rosenberg-fladistctapp-2002.