ANGIE NOVY v. LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al.

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

ANGIE NOVY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No: 8:26-cv-1429-MSS-SPF

LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, (Dkt. 2), which the Court construes as a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Also before the Court is Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. (Dkt. 6) On May 18, 2026, United States Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn issued a Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. 10) Judge Flynn recommended that Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be denied and the Amended Complaint be dismissed with prejudice. (Id.) Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and Recommendation, and the deadline for doing so has passed. Upon consideration of all relevant filings, case law, and being otherwise fully advised, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and DISMISSES the Amended Complaint with prejudice. In the Eleventh Circuit, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation after conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);

Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732, 732 (11th Cir. 1982). A district judge “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). This requires that the district judge “give fresh consideration to those issues to which specific objection has been made by a party.” Jeffrey S. v. State Bd. of Educ., 896 F.2d

507, 512 (11th Cir.1990) (quoting H.R. 1609, 94th Cong. § 2 (1976)). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and

recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994). Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation, in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court finds that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation, (Dkt. 10), is CONFIRMED and ADOPTED as part of this Order. 2. Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, (Dkt. 2), 1s DENIED. 3. Plaintiffs Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 4, The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE any pending motions and CLOSE this case.

DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 10th day of June 2026.

MARYS: SCRIVEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Any Unrepresented Person