Angelita Rodriguez Pacheco v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 26, 2015·No. 03-14-00676-CR·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 03-14-00676-CR 7540871 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/26/2015 2:56:17 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK NO. 03-14-00676-CR

ANGELITA RODRIGUEZ PACHECO, § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN Appellant § 3rd COURT OF APPEALS § AUSTIN, TEXAS VS. § THIRD DISTRICT 10/26/2015 2:56:17 PM § JEFFREY D. KYLE § Clerk THE STATE OF TEXAS, § AUSTIN, TEXAS Appellee §

SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEE’S BRIEF

This motion is presented by the State of Texas, by and through the

undersigned Assistant District Attorney, and in support would show:

I.

The Appellant’s brief was filed on July 28, 2015. The brief for the State of

Texas, Appellee, was originally due on August 27, 2015. This Court granted the

State’s first motion for extension of time to file its brief, requesting an additional 60

days. The State’s brief is now due on October 26, 2015.

II.

The undersigned serves as an Assistant District Attorney in the 33 rd and 424th

District Attorney’s office in Burnet, Texas. In the time since the Court granted the

State’s first motion for extension of time to file Appellee’s Brief, a staffing vacancy

Page 1 of 4 in our office required the undersigned to prepare or assist others in preparing and

presenting five felony cases for trial to a jury. These trials occurred on the weeks of

September 14, September 21, October 5, and October 19, and the undersigned is

currently in the midst of preparation for a felony jury trial set for November 2. In

addition to these trial settings, the undersigned has been required to manage 13

general felony criminal docket settings for Burnet County, along with two Grand

Jury settings. Our office has recently hired an additional Assistant District Attorney

to assist in managing our felony caseload, and so the undersigned expects to have

sufficient time to adequately and clearly brief the issues raised by Appellant in the

near future.

III.

In this case Appellant raises four issues which require extensive research and

a thorough familiarity with the trial record to adequately address. The undersigned

will need an additional 30 days to prepare and file the Appellee’s Brief in this case.

While the undersigned has been able to perform much of the research necessary to

address each of the points raised in Appellant’s brief, more time is needed to

complete the drafting process to simplify and clarify Appellee’s response to those

issues for the benefit of the Court. This is the second motion for extension of time

that the State of Texas has sought in this case.

Page 2 of 4 PRAYER

The State of Texas, in consideration of the facts and circumstances set forth

herein above, prays the Court grant this motion and extend the due date for the

Appellee’s Brief to November 25, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY 33RD and 424th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS Wiley B. McAfee, District Attorney P. O. Box 725 Llano, Texas 78643 Telephone Telecopier (325) 247-5755 (325) 247-5274

/s/ R. Blake Ewing By: ________________________________ R. Blake Ewing Assistant District Attorney State Bar No. 24076376 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true copy of the above and foregoing instrument, together with this proof of service hereof, has been forwarded on the 26th day of October 2015, to Mr. Gary Prust, Attorney for Appellant, by facsimile and/or by email at gary@prustlaw.com

/s/ R. Blake Ewing _____________________________

Page 3 of 4 R. Blake Ewing Assistant District Attorney

Page 4 of 4

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Angelita Rodriguez Pacheco v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Angelita Rodriguez Pacheco v. State (Angelita Rodriguez Pacheco v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.