Angelita Rodriguez Pacheco v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 20, 2015
Docket03-14-00676-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Angelita Rodriguez Pacheco v. State (Angelita Rodriguez Pacheco v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Angelita Rodriguez Pacheco v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ACCEPTED 03-14-00676-CR 4954555 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/20/2015 2:30:06 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK NO. 03-14-00676-CR

FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS FOR THE 4/20/2015 2:30:06 PM THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

ANGELITA RODRIGUEZ PACHECO, Appellant

vs.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 424th Judicial District Court Cause No. 41988 Burnet County, Texas The Honorable Dan Mills, Judge Presiding

APPELLANT'S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Gary E. Prust State Bar No. 24056166 1607 Nueces Street Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 469-0092 Fax: (512) 469-9102 gary@prustlaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED APPELLANT’S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

Appellant, Angelita Rodriguez Pacheco, file this, her “Second Motion for

Extension of Time to File Brief,” and in support thereof shows as follows.

I.

1. Appellant's Motion is brought pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P 10.5(b).

2. Appellant has once requested previously an extension of time within which to file

her brief.

3. Appellant's brief is due on April 20, 2015.

4. Appellant's attorney had a very busy trial and appellate schedule during the

months of March and April 2015. Appellant’s attorney authored and filed two briefs in

two unrelated appellate causes in the month of April 2015, and he has had numerous trial

settings and evidentiary hearings.

5. In order to address the issues raised in the present appeal thoroughly, Appellant's

attorney will require more time to complete his brief. Appellant’s attorney will require

until June 19, 2015 to complete his brief.

6. Accordingly, Appellants request that this Court allow him until June 19, 2015 to

file his brief. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Gary E. Prust

Gary E. Prust SBN 24056166 1607 Nueces Street Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 469-0092 Fax: (512) 469-9102 gary@prustlaw.com Attorney for Appellant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

In compliance with Rule 9.5(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the undersigned attorney certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion was served upon Mr. R. Blake Ewing with the 33rd and 424th Judicial District Attorney’s Office via electronic transmission to his email address at asstda2@burnetcountytexas.org in accordance Rule 9.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on this the 18th day of February, 2015.

Gary E. Prust

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. PROC. 9.4(i)(3), I hereby certify this motion contains 167 words. This is a computer-generated document created in Microsoft Word, using 14-point typeface. In making this this certificate, I rely on the word count provided by the software use to prepare the document.

/s/ Gary E Prust

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Angelita Rodriguez Pacheco v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angelita-rodriguez-pacheco-v-state-texapp-2015.