Anfora v. Liberty Communications

737 P.2d 977, 86 Or. App. 9
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 17, 1987·No. WCB 85-03807, 85-03808, 85-06955, 85-06956; CA A40575·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Claimant and Liberty Communications, claimant’s first employer, and Fireman’s Fund Insurance, that employer’s insurer, seek judicial review of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order holding that claimant’s present disability is the result of an aggravation of a back injury he suffered in 1982 while working for Liberty Communications. In so holding, the Board reversed the referee, who had determined that claimant’s present disability is a result of a new injury he suffered while working for Cable Communications in 1984.

On de novo review, we are persuaded that the referee was correct. Smith v. Ed’s Pancake House, 27 Or App 361, 565 P2d 138 (1976).

Reversed and remanded on petition and on cross-petition with instructions to reinstate referee’s opinion and order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anfora v. Liberty Communications, 737 P.2d 977, 86 Or. App. 9 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).

737 P.2d 977 (Anfora v. Liberty Communications) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anfora v. Liberty Communications
744 P.2d 265 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1987)