Anfora v. Liberty Communications
This text of 737 P.2d 977 (Anfora v. Liberty Communications) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Claimant and Liberty Communications, claimant’s first employer, and Fireman’s Fund Insurance, that employer’s insurer, seek judicial review of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order holding that claimant’s present disability is the result of an aggravation of a back injury he suffered in 1982 while working for Liberty Communications. In so holding, the Board reversed the referee, who had determined that claimant’s present disability is a result of a new injury he suffered while working for Cable Communications in 1984.
On de novo review, we are persuaded that the referee was correct. Smith v. Ed’s Pancake House, 27 Or App 361, 565 P2d 138 (1976).
Reversed and remanded on petition and on cross-petition with instructions to reinstate referee’s opinion and order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
737 P.2d 977, 86 Or. App. 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anfora-v-liberty-communications-orctapp-1987.