Andrews v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Andrews v. State

78 So. 3d 1012, 2011 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 100, 2011 WL 7049450

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedMarch 18, 2011

DocketCR-09-1675

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 78 So. 3d 1012 (Andrews v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andrews v. State, 78 So. 3d 1012, 2011 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 100, 2011 WL 7049450 (Ala. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinions

Note from the reporter of decisions: On July 27, 2005, James Earl Andrews filed a Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim.P., petition alleging that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea to second-degree rape, in part because the Montgomery Circuit Court did not sentence him according to a plea agreement he had entered into with the prosecution. The circuit court dismissed Andrews’s petition, and he appealed. On March 18, 2011, the Court of Criminal Appeals issued an order remanding this case to the Montgomery Circuit Court to allow Andrews the opportunity to prove that he was not aware before he was sentenced that the circuit court would not sentence him according to the plea agreement and to allow the State an opportunity to rebut Andrews’s claim. Presiding Judge Welch dissented from the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Note from the reporter of decisions: On July 27, 2005, James Earl Andrews filed a Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim.P., petition alleging that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea to second-degree rape, in part because the Montgomery Circuit Court did not sentence him according to a plea agreement he had entered into with the prosecution. The circuit court dismissed Andrews’s petition, and he appealed. On March 18, 2011, the Court of Criminal Appeals issued an order remanding this case to the Montgomery Circuit Court to allow Andrews the opportunity to prove that he was not aware before he was sentenced that the circuit court would not sentence him according to the plea agreement and to allow the State an opportunity to rebut Andrews’s claim. Presiding Judge Welch dissented from the order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 So. 3d 1012, 2011 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 100, 2011 WL 7049450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-state-alacrimapp-2011.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack