Andrews v. Michigan Central Railroad
This text of 99 Mass. 534 (Andrews v. Michigan Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action against a railroad corporation established in the state of Michigan, and the only service of the writ was upon the treasurer of the corporation at their office in Boston. There was no attachment of property. The writ alleges that the corporation has its usual place of business within the Commonwealth.
We are aware of no authority for the maintenance of such an action; and none has been found by the diligence of the learned counsel for the plaintiff. On the contrary, the numerous cases cited for the defendant fully support the opposite conclusion. A foreign corporation can only be sued in this Commonwealth by means of an attachment of its property; unless, as in the case of foreign insurance companies, by virtue of an express statute provision. The motion to dismiss was rightly allowed. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 Mass. 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-michigan-central-railroad-mass-1868.