Andrews v. Haun

779 P.2d 229, 115 Utah Adv. Rep. 17, 1989 Utah LEXIS 89, 1989 WL 95317
Utah Supreme Court·Decided August 18, 1989·No. 890360·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case is here as a petition for extraordinary relief. It appears from the incomplete submission of the parties, both *230 petitioner and the State, that the Board of Pardons erred in not disclosing certain documents which were apparently before the Board, as required by article VII, section 12, Constitution of Utah. However, the decision of the Board demonstrates that it did not rely on the undisclosed information to any significant extent in declining to commute petitioner’s death sentence.

If Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 106 S.Ct. 2595, 91 L.Ed.2d 335 (1986), has application in this case and if error were committed under Ford, we view the error as harmless.

The petition is denied.

HOWE, Associate C.J., concurs in the result only, not being convinced that the Board of Pardons erred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews v. Haun, 779 P.2d 229, 115 Utah Adv. Rep. 17, 1989 Utah LEXIS 89, 1989 WL 95317 (Utah 1989).

779 P.2d 229 (Andrews v. Haun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tillman v. Cook
855 P.2d 211 (Utah Supreme Court, 1993)
Andrews v. Utah Board of Pardons
836 P.2d 790 (Utah Supreme Court, 1992)
Foote v. Utah Board of Pardons
808 P.2d 734 (Utah Supreme Court, 1991)