Andrew Paul Laiz v. Sharon M. Laiz
This text of Andrew Paul Laiz v. Sharon M. Laiz (Andrew Paul Laiz v. Sharon M. Laiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ June 06, 2025
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A25A1651. ANDREW PAUL LAIZ v. SHARON M. LAIZ.
In this divorce action, the trial court found Andrew Laiz in contempt of the court’s standing order in domestic relations actions. Andrew now directly appeals from that order. We lack jurisdiction. Ordinarily, appeals from “judgments or orders in divorce, alimony, and other domestic relations cases,” including orders “holding or declining to hold persons in contempt” of such orders, must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), (b). In this case, however, the order Andrew seeks to appeal is non-final, as the divorce remains pending. Therefore, in order to appeal the trial court’s order, Andrew was required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure and obtain a certificate of immediate review. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Onyemobi v. Onyemobi, __ Ga. App. __, Case No. A25A0570 (May 29, 2025) (holding that parties in divorce cases that challenge interlocutory custody rulings must comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure). Parties seeking appellate review from an interlocutory order that also implicates the discretionary application statute must comply with the interlocutory application statute. See generally Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 832-833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996). Andrew’s failure to follow the proper appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/06/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Andrew Paul Laiz v. Sharon M. Laiz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrew-paul-laiz-v-sharon-m-laiz-gactapp-2025.