Andre Maurice Carstarphen, Sr. v. Kennth Gillespie

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-13037

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

ANDRE MAURICE CARSTARPHEN, JR., Plaintiff,

ANDRE MAURICE CARSTARPHEN, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus KENNTH GILLESPIE, Detective at MPD, MATHEW SIMPSON, Prosecutor at Daphne Municipal Court, ROBERT H. SMITH, Former Judge, RONDELLA HOWARD,

2

2 Opinion of the Court 23-13037

J. SINGHTON,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 1:22-cv-00412-JB-N

____________________

Before WILSON, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction . Andre Carstarphen, Sr., proceeding pro se, appeals from the magistrate judge’s order directing the clerk to terminate him as a plaintiff. We lack jurisdiction to review the order because it has not been reviewed or rendered final by the district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Donovan v. Sarasota Concrete Co., 693 F.2d 1061, 1066- 67 (11th Cir. 1982); United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1359 (11th Cir. 2009).

No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.