Anderson v. Verizon New York, Inc.

2021 NY Slip Op 00226
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 14, 2021
DocketIndex No. 302504/14 Appeal No. 12867 Case No. 2019-03289
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 00226 (Anderson v. Verizon New York, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Verizon New York, Inc., 2021 NY Slip Op 00226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Anderson v Verizon New York, Inc. (2021 NY Slip Op 00226)
Anderson v Verizon New York, Inc.
2021 NY Slip Op 00226
Decided on January 14, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: January 14, 2021
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Singh, Mendez, JJ.

Index No. 302504/14 Appeal No. 12867 Case No. 2019-03289

[*1]Demoyne Anderson, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Verizon New York, Inc., et al., Defendants, Cablevision Systems Corporation et al., Defendants-Respondents.


PeÑa & Kahn, PLLC, Bronx (Eric J. Gottfried of counsel), for appellant.

Lester, Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP, New York (C. Briggs Johnson of counsel), for Cablevision Systems Corporation and Cablevision Systems New York City Corporation, respondents.

Gannon, Rosenfarb & Drossman, New York (Lisa L. Gokhulsingh of counsel), for Beach Lane Management Co., and 1265 Olmstead Avenue, LLC, respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Sherman, J.), entered on or about July 15, 2019, which granted defendants' motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff's attempt to walk through a pile of snow alongside the sidewalk as a shortcut to his parked car, instead of using the portion of the sidewalk that had been cleared of snow and ice, was the sole proximate cause of his accident (see McKenzie v City of New York, 116 AD3d 526, 527 [1st Dept 2014]; see also Tzamarot v JP Morgan Chase & Co., 167 AD3d 550 [1st Dept 2018], lv denied 33 NY3d 904 [2019]).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: January 14, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. Verizon New York, Inc.
2021 NY Slip Op 00226 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 00226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-verizon-new-york-inc-nyappdiv-2021.