Anderson v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Anderson v. United States

27 Cust. Ct. 321

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 30 Cust. Ct. 420 →

United States Customs Court·Decided September 20, 1951·No. No. 55896; protests 125192-K, etc. (San Francisco)·Published

Opinion

[322]*322Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the shells involved in Abstracts 55389 and 50357, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1738 was sustained. Other items stipulated to be the same as the articles involved in Abstract 52477 were held dutiable at 33}<s percent under paragraph 412.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[322]*322Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the shells involved in Abstracts 55389 and 50357, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1738 was sustained. Other items stipulated to be the same as the articles involved in Abstract 52477 were held dutiable at 33}<s percent under paragraph 412.

Anderson v. United States, 27 Cust. Ct. 321 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

27 Cust. Ct. 321 (Anderson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.