Anderson v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Anderson v. United States

27 Cust. Ct. 321

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 20, 1951

DocketNo. 55896; protests 125192-K, etc. (San Francisco)

StatusPublished

This text of 27 Cust. Ct. 321 (Anderson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. United States, 27 Cust. Ct. 321 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

[322]*322Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the shells involved in Abstracts 55389 and 50357, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1738 was sustained. Other items stipulated to be the same as the articles involved in Abstract 52477 were held dutiable at 33}<s percent under paragraph 412.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[322]*322Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the shells involved in Abstracts 55389 and 50357, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1738 was sustained. Other items stipulated to be the same as the articles involved in Abstract 52477 were held dutiable at 33}<s percent under paragraph 412.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Cust. Ct. 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-united-states-cusc-1951.