Anderson v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 343, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1730
United States Customs Court·Decided June 15, 1949·No. No. 53268; protests 27752-K, etc. (Seattle)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is same in all material respects as that passed upon in Oy Wo Tong v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372). In accordance therewith, bak hop and lotus nuts (hoi pak lin) were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 as crude drugs and yuk ehuk pein was held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 34 as drugs, advanced.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 343, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1730 (cusc 1949).
22 Cust. Ct. 343 (Anderson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oy Wo Tong Co. v. United States
5 Cust. Ct. 70 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)