Anderson v. Svard
This text of 644 S.E.2d 861 (Anderson v. Svard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We granted husband’s application for a discretionary appeal in this divorce case to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in awarding attorney fees to wife pursuant to OCGA § 19-6-2. We find that the trial court did abuse its discretion because there is no evidence in the record with regard to the financial circumstances of the parties. OCGA§ 19-6-2 (a) (1); Findley v. Findley, 280 Ga. 454,463 (629 SE2d 222) (2006); Weaver v. Weaver, 263 Ga. 56, 57 (428 SE2d 79) (1993).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
644 S.E.2d 861, 282 Ga. 53, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 1457, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-svard-ga-2007.