Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Anderson v. State

Anderson v. State

137 S.E. 913, 36 Ga. App. 645, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 207
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 Ga. App. 602 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 12, 1927·No. 17886·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The overruling of an extraordinary motion for a new trial based solely upon alleged newly discovered evidence is complained of in this case. After a careful consideration of that evidence as disclosed by the record, we are of the opinion that it is not of such a character as would probably produce a different verdict upon another trial. Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State, 137 S.E. 913, 36 Ga. App. 645, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 207 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

137 S.E. 913 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.