Anderson v. State

133 S.E. 105, 35 Ga. App. 357, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 349
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 12, 1926
Docket17116
StatusPublished

This text of 133 S.E. 105 (Anderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. State, 133 S.E. 105, 35 Ga. App. 357, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 349 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in the special ground of the motion for a new trial, and this court will not say that there is no evidence to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur. H. II. Elders, for plaintiff in error. M. 17. Eason, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 S.E. 105, 35 Ga. App. 357, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-state-gactapp-1926.