Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Anderson v. State

Anderson v. State

632 So. 2d 136, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 789, 1994 WL 34018
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 592 So. 2d 1119 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 1994·No. No. 93-0329·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction on the authority of Smith v. State, 632 So.2d 136, Case No. 93-0189, opinion issued February 9, 1994. The state concedes a sentencing error because the written sentence does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement, and we therefore reverse and remand for resen-tencing in conformance with the oral pronouncement of sentence.

DELL, C.J., and ANSTEAD and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State, 632 So. 2d 136, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 789, 1994 WL 34018 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

632 So. 2d 136 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
632 So. 2d 136 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)