Anderson v. Pettiford

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. Pettiford. Read the opinion of the Court — 241 F. App'x 934
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2007·No. 07-6986·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6986

MICHAEL RAY ANDERSON, a/k/a Michael Anderson,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL PETTIFORD, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Bennettsville,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (8:07-cv-00943-CMC)

Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 11, 2007

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Ray Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Ray Anderson, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Anderson v. Pettiford, No. 8:07-cv-00943-CMC

(D.S.C. May 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. Pettiford, (4th Cir. 2007).

Anderson v. Pettiford (Anderson v. Pettiford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241