Anderson v. Pettiford
This text of Anderson v. Pettiford (Anderson v. Pettiford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6986
MICHAEL RAY ANDERSON, a/k/a Michael Anderson,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL PETTIFORD, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Bennettsville,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (8:07-cv-00943-CMC)
Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 11, 2007
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Ray Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Michael Ray Anderson, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Anderson v. Pettiford, No. 8:07-cv-00943-CMC
(D.S.C. May 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anderson v. Pettiford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-pettiford-ca4-2007.