Anderson v. Pettiford

241 F. App'x 934
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2007·No. No. 07-6986·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ray Anderson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Pettiford, No. 8:07-cv-00943-CMC, 2007 WL 1577673 (D.S.C. May 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. Pettiford, 241 F. App'x 934 (4th Cir. 2007).

241 F. App'x 934 (Anderson v. Pettiford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bobbitt v. Entzel
N.D. West Virginia, 2020
Ozsusamlar v. Entzel
N.D. West Virginia, 2020
Hill v. Coakley
N.D. West Virginia, 2018