Anderson v. O'Malley

CourtDistrict Court, D. Minnesota
DecidedFebruary 12, 2024
Docket0:22-cv-02358
StatusUnknown

This text of Anderson v. O'Malley (Anderson v. O'Malley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. O'Malley, (mnd 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Paula A., Case No. 22-CV-2358 (KMM/DJF) Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

Martin O’Malley,1 Commissioner of Social Security

Defendant.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster, dated October 11, 2023. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted. The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F. Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon,

1 Martin J. O’Malley became the Commissioner of Social Security on December 20, 2023. Press Release, Social Security Administration, available at https://www.ssa.gov/news/press/releases/2023/#12-2023-2 [archived at https://perma.cc/2FF2-GV8T]. Under Rule 25, as the successor to former Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi, Mr. O’Malley is “automatically substituted as a party.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no clear error,

and the R&R is adopted in full. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Commissioner’s denial of benefits is reversed and this matter be REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42

U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings consistent with this Report and Recommendation; and. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF ) is DENIED in all other respects

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly. Date: February 12, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Anderson v. O'Malley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-omalley-mnd-2024.