Anderson v. Lynch
This text of 292 A.D.2d 603 (Anderson v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, dated November 3, 1999, which revoked a determination of the District Rent Administrator, dated November 27, 1995, awarding the petitioner a rent overcharge and refund, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), dated September 27, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
[604]*604The Supreme Court properly determined that the respondent correctly refused to consider the rent history of the appellant’s rent-stabilized apartment beyond the four-year period measured from the appellant’s filing of his rent overcharge complaint (see Myers v Frankel, 292 AD2d 575 [decided herewith]; Silver v Lynch, 283 AD2d 213; Matter of Sessler v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 282 AD2d 262).
The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Santucci, S. Miller and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
292 A.D.2d 603, 739 N.Y.S.2d 622, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-lynch-nyappdiv-2002.