Anderson v. Longden

14 U.S. 85
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 15, 1816
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 U.S. 85 (Anderson v. Longden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. Longden, 14 U.S. 85 (1816).

Opinion

Marshall, Ch. J.

The case of the sheriff’s bond is very different. The commission of sheriffs . xr. „ ■ , . ,. • ,m Virginia, is annual; oí course, his sureties are bound for one year only.- It is true, the directors of this company are elected annually; hut the company has not said that the agent shall be for one year only: his appointment is during - pleasure. The sureties do not become sureties in consequence of their confidence in the directors, but of their confidence in the agent whose sureties they are. The court is unanimously of the opinion that the judgment of the circuit court ought to be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. Longden
14 U.S. 85 (Supreme Court, 1816)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 U.S. 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-longden-scotus-1816.