Anderson v. Cortland City School District
This text of 171 A.D.2d 1017 (Anderson v. Cortland City School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We agree for the reasons stated in the decision of Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Hurlbutt, J.), that the position of teaching assistant is not included within the meaning of the word "teacher” as used in Education Law § 3014-b. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hurlbutt, J.— Article 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Lowery and Davis, JJ. [See, 147 Misc 2d 7.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 A.D.2d 1017, 579 N.Y.S.2d 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-cortland-city-school-district-nyappdiv-1991.