Anderson v. Cortland City School District
171 A.D.2d 1017, 579 N.Y.S.2d 597
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 8, 1991·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We agree for the reasons stated in the decision of Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Hurlbutt, J.), that the position of teaching assistant is not included within the meaning of the word "teacher” as used in Education Law § 3014-b. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hurlbutt, J.— Article 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Lowery and Davis, JJ. [See, 147 Misc 2d 7.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. Cortland City School District, 171 A.D.2d 1017, 579 N.Y.S.2d 597 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).
171 A.D.2d 1017 (Anderson v. Cortland City School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Putnam Northern Westchester Board of Cooperative Educational Services v. Mills
46 A.D.3d 1062 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Madison-Oneida Board of Cooperative Educational Services v. Mills
2 A.D.3d 1240 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Fink v. Avon Central School District
207 A.D.2d 973 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Robinson v. Bruni
193 A.D.2d 1072 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)