Anderson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided March 16, 2020·No. 1:18-cv-01161·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

WILLIAM EDWARD ANDERSON JR., Case No. 1:18-cv-01161-SI Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA & COSTS vs. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C § 1920 COMMISSIONER, Social Security Administration, Defendant. Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $6,250.27 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and costs of $400.00, for the filing fee, pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1920. Payment of this award shall be via check made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s attorneys at HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C., 474 Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010), the award shall be made payable to Katherine Eitenmiller, HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C., if the Commissioner confirms that Plaintiff owes no debt to the Government through the federal treasury offset program. If Plaintiff has such debt, the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to counsel’s office at the address provided above. Dated this _1_6_t_h_ day of __M_a_r_c_h______ 2020. _/_s/_ M__i_c_h_a_el_ _H_. _S_i_m_o_n______________________ MICHAEL H. SIMON United States Magistrate Judge Proposed Order submitted by: Katherine L. Eitenmiller HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.C. 474 Willamette Street, Eugene, OR 97401 (541) 686-1969

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2020).

Anderson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Anderson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)