Anderson v. Barlow

256 A.D.2d 1234, 682 N.Y.S.2d 788
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 1998·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner contends that Family Court erred in dismissing her custody [1235] petition. We disagree. The court was “in the best position to evaluate the character and credibility of the witnesses” (Matter of Paul C. v Tracy C., 209 AD2d 955, 956), and we see no reason to disturb the court’s determination. Similarly, the court properly determined that respondent’s relocation was in the best interests of the child (see, Matter of Tropea v Tropea, 87 NY2d 727, 741). Finally, the court did not abuse its discretion in failing to impose sanctions against respondent for violating a 1993 custody determination. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Townsend, J. — Custody.) Present — Den-man, P. J., Green, Hayes, Callahan and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. Barlow, 256 A.D.2d 1234, 682 N.Y.S.2d 788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

256 A.D.2d 1234 (Anderson v. Barlow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

KIRKPATRICK, JESSICA LYNN, KIRKPATRICK, RICHARD C. v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
Kirkpatrick v. Kirkpatrick
137 A.D.3d 1695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Barlow v. Anderson
256 A.D.2d 1235 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Anderson v. Barlow
256 A.D.2d 1235 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)