Anderson v. Armstrong
132 S.W.2d 393, 132 Tex. 122
Opinion
The plaintiff in error, having, in response to order of this Court heretofore entered, filed bond in accordance with the statute in such cases made and provided, we have again carefully reviewed and considered this case, in the light of the motions for rehearing filed herein, and are of the opinion that the conclusions reached herein, as shown by the opinion on file, is correct, and all motions for rehearing are overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anderson v. Armstrong, 132 S.W.2d 393, 132 Tex. 122 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1939).
132 S.W.2d 393 (Anderson v. Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Law Office of Oscar C. Gonzalez, Inc. and Oscar Gonzalez v. Isabel Sloan
447 S.W.3d 98 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2014)
Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank of Lubbock
571 S.W.2d 39 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1978)
J. S. D. Langford, Individually and as Trustee of the Dorothy Sue Langford Trust v. C. D. Shamburger, Jr.
392 F.2d 939 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
Walling v. Hubbard
389 S.W.2d 581 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1965)
Ward v. Maryland Casualty Co.
166 S.W.2d 117 (Texas Supreme Court, 1942)
Ward v. Maryland Casualty Co.
166 S.W.2d 117 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1942)
Taylor v. Burns
12 Wash. 2d 686 (Washington Supreme Court, 1942)
In Re Peterson's Estate
123 P.2d 733 (Washington Supreme Court, 1942)
Diaz v. Chinn
150 S.W.2d 411 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)