Anderson v. Armstrong

Texas Commission of Appeals

Anderson v. Armstrong

132 S.W.2d 393, 132 Tex. 122

CourtTexas Commission of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 4, 1939

DocketNo. 2164—7092

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 132 S.W.2d 393 (Anderson v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Armstrong, 132 S.W.2d 393, 132 Tex. 122 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, having, in response to order of this Court heretofore entered, filed bond in accordance with the statute in such cases made and provided, we have again carefully reviewed and considered this case, in the light of the motions for rehearing filed herein, and are of the opinion that the conclusions reached herein, as shown by the opinion on file, is correct, and all motions for rehearing are overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, having, in response to order of this Court heretofore entered, filed bond in accordance with the statute in such cases made and provided, we have again carefully reviewed and considered this case, in the light of the motions for rehearing filed herein, and are of the opinion that the conclusions reached herein, as shown by the opinion on file, is correct, and all motions for rehearing are overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 S.W.2d 393, 132 Tex. 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-armstrong-texcommnapp-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack