Anders v. California

386 U.S. 264

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 20, 1967·No. 12·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are' granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 264 (1967).

Pincite

386 U.S. 264 (Anders v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

United States v. Svetoslav Nedelchev

697 F. App'x 873 (Seventh Circuit, 2017)

United States v. Danny Dixon

476 F. App'x 438 (Seventh Circuit, 2012)

United States v. John High

378 F. App'x 587 (Seventh Circuit, 2010)

United States v. James Harper

311 F. App'x 923 (Seventh Circuit, 2009)

Williams, Tyrone v. United States