Guillory v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Guillory v. State

626 So. 2d 1010, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11149, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2365

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 3, 1993

DocketNo. 92-02044

StatusPublished

This text of 626 So. 2d 1010 (Guillory v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guillory v. State, 626 So. 2d 1010, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11149, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2365 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 264, 87 S.Ct. 1032, 18 L.Ed.2d 40 (1967). We affirm the judgment but remand this case for correction of the sentence. The written sentence fails to note that the sentence imposed in case number' 92-2638 is to run concurrently with the eighteen-month control release sentence imposed [1011]*1011after revocation of probation in case number 91-1167.

Remanded with directions to correct the sentence. The appearance of the defendant is not required.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 264, 87 S.Ct. 1032, 18 L.Ed.2d 40 (1967). We affirm the judgment but remand this case for correction of the sentence. The written sentence fails to note that the sentence imposed in case number' 92-2638 is to run concurrently with the eighteen-month control release sentence imposed [1011]*1011after revocation of probation in case number 91-1167.

Remanded with directions to correct the sentence. The appearance of the defendant is not required.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

626 So. 2d 1010, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11149, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guillory-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack