AMW v. State
This text of 980 So. 2d 1219 (AMW v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A.M.W., A Child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Robert E. Wildridge, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
PER CURIAM.
The Florida Supreme Court reinstated this appeal for reconsideration in light of *1220 Kelso v. State, 961 So.2d 277 (Fla.2007). An opinion of this court was previously issued on June 30, 2006, A.M.W. v. State, 934 So.2d 564 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). The majority of the opinion is unaffected by Kelso; however, based upon that decision this court's earlier disposition of A.M.W.'s double jeopardy claim as it related to convictions for both theft of a firearm and grand theft for other items is withdrawn, and we substitute the following language in its stead.
A.M.W. argues that he may not be convicted of both grand theft of a firearm and third-degree grand theft of other items when both charges arise from the same burglary. This issue was resolved by the supreme court adverse to A.M.W.'s position in Kelso, 961 So.2d 277.
A.M.W.'s adjudication for grand theft of a firearm is AFFIRMED. The remaining counts are unaffected by this decision and remain as set forth in this court's earlier opinion.
GRIFFIN, MONACO and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
980 So. 2d 1219, 2008 WL 1913871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amw-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.