Amkor Technology, Inc. v. International Trade Commission

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Amkor Technology, Inc. v. International Trade Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 692 F.3d 1250
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 11, 2011·No. 2010-1550·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is n0np1'ecedentia1. United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Circuit AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC., /-‘1ppellant, V. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, ' Appellee, and CARSEM (M) SDN BHD, CARSEM SEMICONDUCTOR SDN BHD (ALs0 KNOWN As REcAMs SDN BHI)), AND CARSEM, INC., Interven0rs. 201()~1550 011 appeal from the United States Inte1‘nati0nal T1'ade C0n1missi0n in InveStigati011 N0. 337-TA-501. ON MOTION ORDER Up0n consideration of Amk0r Techn0l0g'y, Inc.’s mo- tion t0 withdraw C0nstantine L. Tre1a, Jr. as principal

AMKOR TECH V. ITC 2 counsel and to substitute Bryan Farney as principal c0unse1, IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted Bryan Farney should promptly file a new entry of appearance as principal counsel FOR THE COURT JAN 11 zim /swan H01iba1y ' Date J an Horba1y . Clerk cc: C0nstantine L. Tre1a, Jr., Esq. Bryan Farney, Esq. Michae1 Liberman, Esq. L0uis S. Mastriani, Esq. s21 FlLED u.s. count or AP F0n ms FEneRAL ¢"iiiE2'i‘:li?n JAN 1 1 2011 .lANH9RBAl.Y G.ERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amkor Technology, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Amkor Technology, Inc. v. International Trade Commission (Amkor Technology, Inc. v. International Trade Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.