Amiri v. Gelman Management Company
This text of Amiri v. Gelman Management Company (Amiri v. Gelman Management Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
pt .’l ~.¢J
Clerk, ‘)‘ 1.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Courts *0: tt
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ABDUL WAKIL AMIRI,
Plaintiff,
CivilAction N0.
v. GELMAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY, l
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs application to proceed in forma paup his pro se complaint. For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant the application ai
dismiss the complaint.
Plaintiff alleges that his former landlord, Gelman Management Company ("Gelm
~- r.- ?-fa" » _ e¢‘” f l 10 ?
¢s ict ~’. 5a é erz`s and id ina')), defamed him and discriminated against him by representing to the Superior Court of the District of Columbia that he had not paid rent for several months, and by effecting his eviction in Notwithstanding plaintiff’ s allegations of discrimination based on his nationality, plaintiff’ s 2009. claims arise from the parties’ landlord-tenant relationship - claims which are properly brought in the Superior Court. Federal district courts have jurisdiction in civil actions arising under the Constitut laws or treaties of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. ln addition, federal district c have jurisdiction over civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000, and is between citizens of different States. See 28 U.S.C. § l332(a). Plaintiff purports to brin ion, ourts the suit g a civil rights claim against a private entity, and thus fails to present a federal question under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because this provision applies only to "person[ s] who [act], under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia.’ Id. Because all the parties are in the District of Columbia, plaintiff fails to establish diversity jurisdiction. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter A…rt Url/ited Stat`efs@istrict Judge jurisdiction. An Order is issued separately. DATE; il \?fl> il?,/
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Amiri v. Gelman Management Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amiri-v-gelman-management-company-dcd-2012.